{"id":3402,"date":"2022-11-24T06:58:03","date_gmt":"2022-11-24T06:58:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/savebritain.org\/?p=3402"},"modified":"2022-11-24T06:58:06","modified_gmt":"2022-11-24T06:58:06","slug":"uk-court-rejects-sturgeons-scottish-independence-referendum-bid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/savebritain.org\/uk-court-rejects-sturgeons-scottish-independence-referendum-bid\/","title":{"rendered":"UK Court REJECTS Sturgeon’s Scottish Independence Referendum Bid"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has ruled that the Scottish Parliament cannot legislate for a second independence referendum without the consent of Westminster.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The case was filed after First Minister Nicola Sturgeon announced plans for a second referendum on independence on October 19, 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But, according to Supreme Court President Lord Reed, “the Scottish parliament does not have the power to legislate for a referendum on Scottish independence.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It means that the Lord Advocate, the Scottish Government’s top legal officer, will be unable to clear the Bill for passage through the Scottish Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dorothy Bain had brought the Scottish Independence Referendum Bill before the court, seeking a ruling on whether Holyrood had the authority to pass the legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ms Bain stated that the issue had been “festering” since the beginning of devolution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sir James Eadie KC, its legal representative, also argued that the Bill was too early for the court to rule on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lord Reed stated that he agreed with the Lord Advocate’s argument that the court should rule on the matter in the public interest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reading out a summary of the judgment, he firstly said the court was not being asked to express \u201ca view on the political question of whether Scotland should become an independent country\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He said: \u201cIts task is solely to interpret the relevant provisions of the Scotland Act and decide whether the proposed Bill would relate to reserved matters.\u201d<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has ruled that the Scottish Parliament cannot legislate for a second independence referendum without the consent of Westminster. The case was filed after … <\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3403,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[16,77,78,44],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/savebritain.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3402"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/savebritain.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/savebritain.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/savebritain.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/savebritain.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3402"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/savebritain.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3402\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3404,"href":"https:\/\/savebritain.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3402\/revisions\/3404"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/savebritain.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3403"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/savebritain.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/savebritain.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3402"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/savebritain.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}